Please keep the description of the locations in mind, especially with regards to the environmental situation. With that being said, let’s take a closer look at the pictures themselves. Instead I will give a more thorough analysis at the end of each location subsection. Given the huge amount of pictures in my field tests, I will continue with my modus operandi from my previous camo reviews and not describe or comment on each picture. At the moment it is so overgrown, that I would not be visible even when standing. Having in mind the three different positions mentioned before, I usually end up with 6 pictures of each location. The prone position (to mimic basic, up to ideal concealment without using vegetational enhancements) If the vegetation is too high, I leave that position out.Īs always I photographed the patterns with a wide angle lens at first and then with 35mm focal length, which mimics the actual picture the human eye would perceive at this distance.Standing in the open (to get an idea of the pattern in this particular surroundings and if the colors match it).The pictures portray three different positions: Information about the various locations will be stated in the subsections. The pattern was tested in a Central European environment. I always do a proper white balance to make colors appear the way they are.Ī short explanation to the environment and the procedure:.jpeg compression to make it web compliant I did not edit the pictures in any special way, except the following: That way you can compare the various field tests I have done so far with each other.īefore I start, please consider the following – as always: The pictures were taken at the same locations I always use to make my camouflage comparisons. This time for example, I used a SloCam Boonie to provide a better silhouette disruption, since the basecap was just too obvious to detect. Also, I conduct them with my best knowledge and the available resources. With that being said, let’s go quickly over the usual caveats and then jump right into the field test.Īs always, I want to mention the usual caveats beforehand: First of all, I do not claim any scientific standard with my camouflage comparisons. This is a direct result of the US Army Camouflage Improvement Effort, which was asking for such a solution in its tender. Using the same pattern elements as the original Multicam, the “Tropic” variant consists of:Īs a result of the same pattern and the colour combinations, it is possible (and also intended) to mix the various variants with gear made from the original Multicam. Being the green variation that it is, it comes to no surprise that the pattern has been used in temperate environments as well, as long as the vegetation features a fresh green appearance. The “Tropic” variant is specifically designed for “verdant” and “dense jungle”. Being one of the most well known camouflage patterns, Multicam has been available in several different colorations since late 2013. Multicam Tropic does not need an introduction, or backgrounder. So without further ado, let’s get into the topic and see what we got. Some of those pictures you might have already seen. This proved to be already very insightful in comparison with PenCott Wildwood and also SloCam. Luckily enough Recon Company helped me out in this regard and I was able to get my hands on a set. Easier said than done, since the pattern is actually not that easy to get in Europe and also because I cannot jump on any pattern my readers want me to test. For a very long time now, I have been asked on a regular basis to do a field test of Multicam Tropic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |